Minnesota Supreme Court: The Legal Foundation of These Charges is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Minnesota Supreme Court: The Legal Foundation of These Charges is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

When the State’s legal premise is ruled UNCONSTITUTIONAL, why did the Attorney General’s Office choose to pursue the most aggressive RICO charges against the "Willis family name" unless the objective was to defend a calculated political image rather than pursue justice?
The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) has publicly dealt with controversies involving another high-profile individual named Willis.
The Charge: The AGO chose to file the most aggressive RICO and Aggravated Theft charges against Chavis Dupree Willis (a former felon with the same sensitive last name).
The Unconstitutional Act: The charges were filed at the precise moment the Governor needed the headline, even though the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled the legal theory behind the case is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
This is not a mistake; it is documented, willful disregard for due process to secure a political conviction.
The state settled with NUWAY Alliance, a company accused of "verifiable fraud" for over $18.5 million. In contrast, the state is pursuing criminal charges against Granny's, a black-owned business, over a legal disagreement on administrative compliance. This section will argue that this is evidence of a two-tiered system of justice.
“Justice should not depend on who you are or who you know.”
Granny’s Helpful Hands wasn’t failing—it was thriving. After years of dedication, sacrifice, and community service, the company was just 30–40 days away from finalizing an $11 million sale. This sale wasn’t just a financial transaction. It represented:
Before the deal could close, the state launched a sudden raid—without warning—destroying the buyer’s confidence and collapsing negotiations overnight. With one aggressive action:
The timing was not coincidence—it was calculated collateral damage. By acting just before the sale, the state ensured that Granny’s could not recover. This wasn’t about justice. It was about control and elimination, targeting a minority-owned business when it was at its strongest point.
What’s at Stake for Everyone
This is bigger than one family or one business.
“The raid didn’t just take away an $11 million sale—it stole a legacy, silenced a community resource, and set a dangerous precedent for every small business owner.”
Attorney General Keith Ellison’s past reveals an unexpected connection: his history intersects with a gang leader who shares the same last name as the defendant, Willis. While this does not prove direct involvement, the connection is unusual—and it raises serious questions about whether this prosecution is motivated by something more than law and evidence.
When viewed alongside the timing of the raid, the collapse of the $11 million sale, and the contrasting treatment of NUWAY Alliance, the Ellison–Willis connection cannot be ignored. It adds another layer to a troubling pattern: one where politics and personal history appear to override facts and fairness.
“Justice must be impartial. When politics and personal history enter the courtroom, justice is compromised.”
The video below provides a broader lens. They show how systemic bias, selective enforcement, and political agendas have repeatedly undermined the progress of Black entrepreneurs. Each story adds weight to the argument that Granny’s is not an exception—it is part of a national crisis of justice and equity.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz is expected to unveil new initiatives aimed at addressing fraud across the state. The announcement will outline steps to strengthen oversight, protect taxpayer dollars, and restore public trust. Stay tuned for key details on the proposed measures and their potential impact on Minnesota’s businesses and communities.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.